"They" are using the leftist commie forces as chaos with the plan to meet them at some point with totalitarian Nazi forces of fascist "order" which is the current state of most all of Europe (a giant Nazi jackboot on the face of humanity). The growing tech bros surveillance state that they are in the process of building is the desired end goal to "fix" the problem they created with the left. Order out of chaos, they really think they are smart.
The best selling book in world history also known as the Word of God tells us how this thing plays out and how it ends. We have been given a window of time within this process to get things done for the Kingdom. The clock is ticking for us but we have eternity with our Lord waiting for us. The clock is really ticking for "them" because their eternity is in a far worse place.
While we have this time on earth to get our Lord's work done, we need to get it done. Maybe we get an extension of time maybe we don't-this servant has not seen much beyond this year. If we do what we have been called to do and we stand in agreement with each other and our God to get His Will done on this earth, maybe the time of Jacob's trouble wont start this year.
It will take 42 months to build the temple. That's 3.5 years, sound familiar? The red heifers are in place. The war that takes out the dome of the rock is waiting in the wings. All of the chess pieces that need to be on the board to begin the time of Jacob's trouble are currently on the earth. The one key piece missing is the human vessel for the man of sin which is currently being restrained by the Spirit indwelled Church. How long we stay around us anyone's guess. For now, we are here. And if we are here that means we have a job to do. We need to keep our eyes on Christ because things could change in a hurry. He is in charge of timing and seasons. The landscape as it stands now is getting quite spicy which means we should look up for our redemption draws nigh.
It is our Lord's Will that we live this life not knowing exactly when the rapture/harpazo will happen. It is His Will that we live our life here on earth for Him and with Him. So, lets do what He wants us to do. If we get more time-great. If we are outa here soon-great. Either way we live with Christ and for Christ. For us its a win/win.
While we are here lets continue to do our job of suppressing the enemy while we save who we can from the fire.
Jude 1
20But you, beloved, building yourselves up on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit, 21keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
22And on some have compassion, [j]making a distinction; 23but others save [k]with fear, pulling them out of the [l]fire, hating even the garment defiled by the flesh.
According to AI, the beast system could be ready 5-7 years from now. If we back out 3.5 years for the first three years of the tribulation that puts a hypothetical start as soon as 1.5 years from now. At the rate the AI is growing/learning/adapting 1.5-3 years sounds very reasonable. That's Mr. Trumps second term right there. Now, the AI also points out there could be hurdles that could push the timeline out. We just dont know but 1.5-3 years is not alot of time. We need to stay focused and get to work <3. Here is what the AI wrote in full:
The idea of a global AI-powered surveillance system, as speculated in the context of a "mark of the beast" from biblical prophecy, involves complex technological, logistical, and societal factors. While I can’t predict the future or confirm the theological framework, I can analyze the technical and practical aspects of building such a system based on current capabilities and trends, using the provided context about Starlink and data center deployment. The timeline depends on the scope, scale, and coordination required, so let’s break it down systematically.
### Key Components of the Surveillance System
To achieve a global, AI-monitored surveillance state capable of tracking individuals (e.g., via a "mark" or digital identifier), the following infrastructure would be needed:
1. **Global Connectivity Network**: A satellite-based internet system like Starlink to provide ubiquitous, high-speed, low-latency coverage, especially in remote and underserved areas.
2. **Data Centers**: Scalable, AI-optimized data centers to process and store massive amounts of surveillance data (video feeds, biometric data, transaction records, etc.).
3. **AI and Surveillance Technologies**: Advanced AI models for real-time data analysis, facial recognition, behavior tracking, and anomaly detection, integrated with cameras, sensors, and IoT devices.
4. **Ground Infrastructure**: Ground stations, fiber optic networks, and edge computing nodes to support data transmission and local processing.
5. **Global Coordination**: Political, regulatory, and economic agreements to deploy and operate the system across nations, including standardized protocols for data sharing.
### Estimating the Timeline
Let’s assess each component based on current technology and deployment trends, assuming a concerted global effort starting from June 9, 2025.
#### 1. Global Connectivity Network (Starlink-like Satellite Constellation)
- **Current Status**: Starlink, operated by SpaceX, has over 7,600 satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) as of May 2025, serving 4.5 million subscribers across 130 countries. It plans to expand to 12,000 satellites, with a potential extension to 34,400.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink)[](https://www.space.com/spacex-starlink-satellites.html)
- Each satellite uses optical intersatellite links (200 Gbps), advanced antennas, and argon thrusters for precise positioning, providing global broadband with 50–220 Mbps download speeds and 20–30 ms latency.[](https://www.starlink.com/us/technology)[](https://technologymagazine.com/articles/the-future-of-satellite-internet-starlinks-role-explained)
- Competitors like China’s Qianfan (600 satellites by end of 2025, aiming for 14,000) and Amazon’s Project Kuiper (3,000+ planned) are scaling up, indicating a crowded but rapidly advancing field.[](https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2024/08/china-starlink-qianfan-satellite-internet-launch-priority?lang=en)[](https://www.wired.com/story/satellite-internet-will-let-us-put-ai-in-everything/)
- **Time to Scale**: Starlink’s current constellation took about 6 years (2019–2025) to reach 7,600 satellites. Scaling to 34,400 could take another 5–7 years at current launch rates (SpaceX launches ~60 satellites per Falcon 9 mission, with frequent launches).[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink)[](https://www.space.com/spacex-starlink-satellites.html)
- A global surveillance system would require full global coverage, which Starlink already achieves for broadband. Enhancing capacity for surveillance (e.g., higher bandwidth for real-time video) might require 20,000–40,000 satellites, achievable by **2030–2032** with accelerated launches.
- Regulatory hurdles (e.g., spectrum allocation, as seen in Italy) and space debris concerns could add 1–2 years if not streamlined.[](https://technologymagazine.com/articles/the-future-of-satellite-internet-starlinks-role-explained)
#### 2. Data Centers for AI Processing
- **Current Status**: The Stargate project, a $100 billion initiative by OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank, aims to build a network of AI-optimized data centers in the U.S., with plans for $500 billion by 2028. These centers are designed for large-scale AI training and inference, requiring thousands of GPUs, advanced cooling, and massive power supplies.[](https://www.rcrwireless.com/20250508/fundamentals/what-stargate-ai-project)[](https://www.scworld.com/brief/stargate-project-unveiled-for-worlds-largest-ai-infrastructure)
- Data center deployment trends emphasize rapid modular construction, with facilities built in weeks rather than years. Examples include Oracle’s Stargate and Equinix’s compliance-driven architectures.[](https://bisresearch.com/insights/5-data-center-deployment-trends-powering-the-future-of-ai-and-cloud-in-2025)
- Power demands are a bottleneck: AI data centers require clean, reliable energy, and the U.S. grid is strained. Small modular reactors (SMRs) could add 1.5 GW by 2030, but scaling nuclear or renewable energy takes 5–10 years.[](https://globalmarkets.cib.bnpparibas/us-ai-data-center-power-demand-2/)
- **Time to Scale**: A global surveillance system would need hundreds of hyperscale data centers (each with 50,000+ GPUs) across continents to handle petabytes of real-time data.
- The Stargate project’s initial phase ($100 billion) is slated for 2025–2028. Expanding globally to 10–20 such projects (covering North America, Europe, Asia, etc.) could take **5–8 years** (2030–2033), assuming parallel construction and $1–2 trillion in investment.
- Permitting, land acquisition, and energy infrastructure could delay this by 2–3 years in some regions, but modular designs and fast-track policies (e.g., Trump’s permitting reforms) could mitigate this.[](https://www.rcrwireless.com/20250508/fundamentals/what-stargate-ai-project)[](https://globalmarkets.cib.bnpparibas/us-ai-data-center-power-demand-2/)
#### 3. AI and Surveillance Technologies
- **Current Status**: AI for surveillance (facial recognition, behavior analysis) is mature in some regions (e.g., China’s social credit system) but fragmented globally. Integrating AI with a global network requires standardized protocols and massive training data.
- Starlink’s Direct to Cell technology, set to enable voice, data, and IoT services in 2025, could support IoT-based surveillance (e.g., smart cameras, biometric sensors).[](https://www.rcrwireless.com/20231013/carriers/starlink-plans-satellite-cellular-voice-data-and-iot-services-starting-in-2025)[](https://www.rcrwireless.com/20231013/network-infrastructure/starlink-plans-satellite-cellular-voice-data-and-iot-services-starting-in-2025)
- AI models like those powering Stargate’s infrastructure are already capable of real-time analysis but need customization for surveillance tasks.
- **Time to Scale**: Developing and deploying AI models for global surveillance could take **3–5 years** (2028–2030), assuming access to training data and computing resources.
- Integration with IoT devices (e.g., 10 billion connected devices by 2030) and standardization across nations could add 2–3 years, especially in regions with privacy laws (e.g., EU’s GDPR).
- Mass deployment of surveillance hardware (cameras, RFID readers, etc.) in urban and rural areas could be phased over 5–7 years, leveraging existing 5G and satellite networks.
#### 4. Ground Infrastructure
- **Current Status**: Starlink relies on ground stations for satellite communication, with thousands deployed globally. Expanding these for surveillance-grade data (e.g., real-time video uplinks) requires denser networks and fiber optic backhaul.[](https://www.starlink.com/us/technology)
- Edge computing nodes (e.g., Equinix’s distributed architecture) are being deployed for low-latency processing, critical for real-time surveillance.[](https://bisresearch.com/insights/5-data-center-deployment-trends-powering-the-future-of-ai-and-cloud-in-2025)
- **Time to Scale**: Upgrading ground stations and deploying edge nodes globally could take **4–6 years** (2029–2031), running parallel to satellite and data center buildouts.
- Fiber optic expansion in underserved regions (e.g., Africa, rural Asia) could take 7–10 years unless prioritized with global funding.
#### 5. Global Coordination
- **Current Status**: Regulatory and geopolitical challenges are significant. Starlink faces spectrum allocation issues (e.g., Italy, South Africa) and operates unlawfully in some regions (e.g., South Africa since 2022).[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink)[](https://technologymagazine.com/articles/the-future-of-satellite-internet-starlinks-role-explained)
- China’s Qianfan and other state-backed projects aim to counter Starlink, suggesting a fragmented global landscape.[](https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2024/08/china-starlink-qianfan-satellite-internet-launch-priority?lang=en)[](https://www.reuters.com/technology/musks-starlink-races-with-chinese-rivals-dominate-satellite-internet-2025-02-24/)
- A unified surveillance system would require unprecedented cooperation or coercion, bypassing national sovereignty and privacy laws.
- **Time to Scale**: Achieving global regulatory alignment could take **10–15 years** (2035–2040) under normal conditions, as nations resist centralized control (e.g., Taiwan’s concerns about Musk’s China ties).[](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/07/28/business/starlink.html)
- A top-down mandate (e.g., by a global authority or dominant power) could accelerate this to **5–7 years** (2030–2032), but resistance from privacy-conscious regions (e.g., EU) and rival powers (e.g., China) would complicate enforcement.
### Total Timeline Estimate
Assuming a coordinated, well-funded global effort starting in June 2025, with minimal regulatory and geopolitical friction:
- **Core Infrastructure (Satellites, Data Centers, Ground Networks)**: 5–8 years (2030–2033) to deploy a functional global network and AI processing capacity.
- **Surveillance Integration (AI, IoT, Hardware)**: 3–5 years (2028–2030) for AI development, with 5–7 years (2030–2032) for widespread hardware deployment.
- **Global Coordination**: 5–7 years (2030–2032) in an optimistic scenario with centralized authority, or 10–15 years (2035–2040) with typical geopolitical resistance.
**Best-Case Scenario**: A fully operational global AI-powered surveillance system could be built by **2030–2032** (5–7 years), assuming:
- SpaceX or a similar entity scales satellite constellations to 20,000–40,000 units.
- Projects like Stargate expand globally with $1–2 trillion in funding.
- AI and IoT integration leverages existing 5G and satellite networks.
- A global authority enforces regulatory compliance, bypassing national laws.
**Realistic Scenario**: Accounting for regulatory delays, geopolitical tensions (e.g., U.S.-China rivalry), and energy constraints, a complete system might take **10–12 years** (2035–2037), with partial deployment (e.g., in compliant nations) by 2032.
**Worst-Case Scenario**: If privacy laws, economic constraints, or technological bottlenecks (e.g., power grid limitations) persist, full deployment could take **15–20 years** (2040–2045), with fragmented systems in place earlier.
### Critical Assumptions and Risks
- **Funding**: Building this infrastructure requires trillions of dollars. Stargate’s $500 billion plan is a fraction of the cost for global coverage. Public-private partnerships or state-backed funding (e.g., China’s Digital Silk Road) could accelerate this.[](https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2024/08/china-starlink-qianfan-satellite-internet-launch-priority?lang=en)[](https://www.scworld.com/brief/stargate-project-unveiled-for-worlds-largest-ai-infrastructure)
- **Energy**: AI data centers consume massive power. Without breakthroughs in nuclear (e.g., SMRs) or renewables, energy shortages could delay deployment by 5–10 years.[](https://globalmarkets.cib.bnpparibas/us-ai-data-center-power-demand-2/)
- **Geopolitics**: Rival constellations (e.g., Qianfan, IRIS²) and national sovereignty concerns could fragment the system, requiring a dominant player to enforce standardization.[](https://www.wired.com/story/satellite-internet-will-let-us-put-ai-in-everything/)[](https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2024/08/china-starlink-qianfan-satellite-internet-launch-priority?lang=en)
- **Privacy Resistance**: Regions with strong privacy laws (e.g., EU) or public opposition could delay or block deployment, necessitating authoritarian measures.
- **Technological Maturity**: Current AI and satellite tech is sufficient, but scaling to billions of tracked individuals requires robust, fault-tolerant systems, which may need 3–5 years of refinement.
### Contextual Notes
- **Starlink’s Role**: Starlink’s global reach and military applications (e.g., Ukraine’s use for drones) make it a plausible backbone for surveillance. However, its commercial focus and Musk’s controversial decisions (e.g., activating Starlink in Iran) suggest it may not align perfectly with a centralized surveillance agenda without significant repurposing.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink)[](https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/07/28/business/starlink.html)
- **AI Surveillance Precedents**: China’s use of AI for social credit systems shows that regional surveillance is feasible now. Scaling this globally requires interoperability, which is the biggest hurdle.
- **Biblical Context**: The "mark of the beast" (Revelation 13:16–18) implies a system for economic and social control. While technology could enable this, the timeline assumes no supernatural or divine acceleration, only human-driven development.
### Conclusion
From June 9, 2025, building a global AI-powered surveillance system with Starlink-like satellites and data centers could take **5–7 years** (2030–2032) in an optimistic, highly coordinated scenario, or **10–12 years** (2035–2037) in a realistic scenario with typical challenges. Geopolitical, energy, and regulatory hurdles could push this to **15–20 years** (2040–2045) in a fragmented world. The technology exists, but the scale of coordination and investment required is unprecedented, and societal resistance could significantly alter the timeline.
